All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.
The lym Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the lym Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The lym and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View lymphoma & CLL content recommended for you
In January 2018, Stephen P. Robinson, from the University Hospitals Bristol, Bristol, UK, and colleagues from the EBMT lymphoma working party, published online in Bone Marrow Transplantation a retrospective, long-term outcome analysis study on the effects of reduced-intensity allogeneic stem cell transplantation (RIST) in patients with relapsed mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).
RIST has mainly been used in MCL patients who relapse following first-line treatments, such as cytarabine, rituximab and autologous stem cell transplantation (autoSCT). Nevertheless, the long-term efficacy and safety of RIST remain unclear. This study sought to gather retrospective registry data of the largest patient cohorts, to examine the effects of RIST on MCL, after the longest ever reported median follow-up of 72 months. The primary endpoints of the study included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), non-relapse mortality (NRM) and disease progression following RIST.
In this retrospective study, a long-term follow-up of the largest MCL patient cohort having undergone RIST was presented. The main results of this study included a 1-year NRM of 24%, mainly attributable to GvHD and infections and a high relapse rate of 40%, 5-years after RIST. According to the authors, these results suggest that RIST could have curative potential for high-risk MCL patients, as an alternative to autoSCT and following appropriate toxicity management. Two unexpected results that might be of interest for future MCL treatment strategies, were also reported: (a) the protective effect of ATG/ALG conditioning; and (b) the deleterious effect of CAMPATH prior to RIST. Major limitations of this study include the retrospective basis of the collected data and the fact that only RIST cases between 2000–2008 were taken into consideration. Nevertheless, this study provides useful information for the successful management of MCL.
References