All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.
The lym Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the lym Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The lym and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View lymphoma & CLL content recommended for you
In February 2017 in a correspondence in the British Journal of Haematology, Anthony R. Mato, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, and colleagues published results of a multicenter retrospective study into the efficacy of dose reduction in CLL patients. Retrospective chart review was conducted for ibrutinib treated CLL patients at three institutions between January 2010 and October 2015. Reduced dose was defined as being below the approved US FDA daily dose of 420 mg for longer than 2 months at treatment initiation or within 3 months of initiation.
In conclusion, the authors state that to their knowledge “this report describes the largest real-world experience of reduced dose ibrutinib in CLL patients” and that reducing ibrutinib dose has been shown for the first time to not result in poorer clinical outcome. The authors argue that future studies should consider weight-based dosing in light of this data, and that reduced dose may result in treatment cost-savings. The authors also acknowledge the small, retrospective nature of this study as being limitations, but they suggest that the data may provide reassurance in cases where reduction is required.
Abstract:
N/A
References