All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.
The lym Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the lym Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The lym and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View lymphoma & CLL content recommended for you
This month, in Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Maria R. Khouri from The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA, et al. published results of their randomized, phase II trial (NCT00899431) investigating non-myeloablative Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation (allo-SCT) with or without lenalidomide for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL).
The study was conducted at the MD Anderson Cancer Center between May 2009 and November 2012. Patients with persistent CLL who did not demonstrate signs of Graft versus Host Disease (GvHD) 90–100 days beyond allo-SCT were randomly assigned at a ratio of 1:1 to receive either lenalidomide or standard care (withdrawal of immunosuppression followed by donor lymphocyte infusion). The initial dose of lenalidomide was 5mg every other day and was increased to 10mg daily if tolerated.
Upon the MD Anderson Cancer Center’s data and safety board’s recommendations, the trial was closed early due to “slow accrual, poor tolerance of lenalidomide, and lack of benefit in the patients who received it.”
The authors state that this is the first randomized study with the aim of assessing the use of lenalidomide 90–100 days post-allo-SCT in patients with persistent CLL. The group concluded that lenalidomide is not a viable option in this patient subset and other strategies are required to safely and effectively treat and manage persistent CLL.
In patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), persistence of disease after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) can result in poor outcomes. In an effort to improve these outcomes, patients with persistent CLL who were 90 to 100 days beyond alloSCT with no evidence of graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) were randomized to receive lenalidomide or standard care (withdrawal of immunosuppression followed by donor lymphocyte infusion). Lenalidomide was initiated at 5 mg every other day and increased to 10 mg daily, if tolerated, in each patient. Of 38 patients enrolled, 17 (45%) met the eligibility criteria for randomization. Of these 17 patients, 8 were randomized to undergo lenalidomide therapy. Five (62%) patients had to stop taking the drug because of toxicity. The main reason for drug discontinuation was acute GVHD in 43% of patients. This incidence was 11% in the patients who were randomized to not receive lenalidomide. With a median follow-up of 2.6 years, the median survival was 3.4 years for those receiving lenalidomide. This was not reached in patients randomized to not receive lenalidomide and in patients in complete remission who were not randomized. These results suggested that treatments other than lenalidomide are needed for persistent CLL after alloSCT.
References