All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.

  TRANSLATE

The lym Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the lym Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The lym and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Efficacy and safety analysis of obinutuzumab or rituximab with chemotherapy for previously untreated FL

By Sara Valente

Share:

Aug 13, 2018


On 1st June 2018, a paper on the efficacy and safety outcomes of immunochemotherapy with obinutuzumab (G) or rituximab (R) in previously untreated follicular lymphoma (FL) was published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology by Wolfgang Hiddemann, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, and colleagues.

The safety and efficacy analysis came from results of the GALLIUM study (NCT01332968) that compared R and G combined with either cyclophosphamide (C), doxorubicin, vincristine (V) and prednisone (P) (CHOP), CVP or bendamustine.

Study Overview

  • N = 1,202 patients with untreated grade 1–3a FL were included in the study.
  • Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either G 1,000 mg on Day 1, 8, and 15 of cycle 1 and day 1 of subsequent cycles or R 375mg/m2 on day 1 of 6–8 cycles
    • N = 601 patients received G plus chemotherapy. 47% were male and the median age was 60 years (range, 26–88)
      • N = 345 patients received bendamustine, n = 196 patients received CHOP and n = 60 patients received CVP
    • N = 601 patients received R plus chemotherapy. 47% were male and the median age was 58 years (range, 23–85)
      • N = 341 patients received bendamustine, n = 203 patients received CHOP and n = 57 patients received CVP
    • The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (INV-PFS)
    • Secondary endpoints included; response rates at end of induction (EOI), overall survival (OS), time-to-next anti-lymphoma treatment (TTNALT) and safety

Key Findings

  • Median follow-up = 41.1 months
  • INV-PFS was significantly longer for G plus chemotherapy (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.54–0.87, P = 0.0016). This was significant across all three arms of chemotherapy, P = 0.75
  • TTNALT was longer for G plus chemotherapy, P = 0.48
  • There was no significant difference in response rates at EOI between the two arms
  • The most frequent adverse events (AEs) grade ≥3 included for G plus chemotherapy included; neutropenia (n = 265), leucopenia (n = 51), febrile neutropenia (n = 42) and infusion-related reactions (n = 40). 42 deaths were reported
  • The most frequent adverse events (AEs) grade ≥3 included for R plus chemotherapy included; neutropenia (n = 226), leucopenia (n = 50), febrile neutropenia (n = 29) and infusion-related reactions (n = 22). 52 deaths were reported

The authors concluded that there was improved efficacy with the G plus chemotherapy treatment arm in patients with previously untreated FL. They noted that cytopenias were reported more frequently with CHOP chemotherapy and more severe infections were reported with bendamustine chemotherapy. Finally, the authors recommended that first-line therapy and subsequent chemotherapy should be considered individually for each patient.

References