All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.
The lym Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the lym Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The lym and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View lymphoma & CLL content recommended for you
This ASCO 2016 oral abstract presentation took place on Sunday June 5, 9:45am–12:45pm, during the ‘Hematologic Malignancies-Lymphoma and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia’ session. This session was chaired by Pr Gilles Salles, Head of the Hematology Department in South Lyon hospitals, Lyon, France.
Dr Caroline Dartigeas, affiliated to the Hematology Unit of CHU Bretonneau, Tours, France, presented the abstract (#7505).
The CLL 2007 SA trial is a randomized, phase III study conducted by the French FILO group and compares rituximab (RTX) maintenance versus observation (OBS) after induction with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) for treating newly diagnosed, fit, elderly (≥65 years) patients with previously untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL).
The primary outcome measure for this study was three-year Progression Free Survival (PFS) supplemented by secondary outcome measures which included EFS, OS, and ORR. Inclusion criteria included B-CLL, Matutes score 4 or 5, Binet score B or C, and age ≥65 years, and no del(17p).
Patients were administerd 4 cycles of induction FCR and then 409 patients in CR/PR were randomized to either maintenance rituximab 500mg/m2 q2m for 2 years (n=202), or observation (n=207). At randomization, patients were stratified for IGHV status, del(11q), and response.
In elderly patients with CLL who achieved a response to induction with FCR, PFS was significantly improved with 2 years of maintenance rituximab compared to observation. This benefit was also observed regardless of MRD status, and in patients with unfavorable characteristics such as del(11q) and unmutated IGHV. Moreover, no difference in OS was found between observation and maintenance rituximab. However, a higher incidence of adverse events was found with rituximab maintenance compared to observation, in particular hematologic and infectious events. Caroline Dartigeas concluded the talk by advising that patients should be carefully followed to detect secondary cancers as early as possible and elderly patients should be monitored for long-term toxicities.
References