On 1 February 2019, Owen O’Connor from Columbia University Medical Centre, New York, NY, USA and colleagues, published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology a phase III study (LUMIERE) investigating the efficacy of alisertib in relapsed or refractory (R/R) peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) patients.
Alisertib is an investigational Aurora A kinase inhibitor. Aurora A kinase is involved in cell mitosis and accumulating evidence indicates its pathological upregulation in PTCL. From phase I-II studies the recommended dose and treatment pattern of alisertib monotherapy have been established, together with its promising activity in various lymphomas, including R/R B-cell and T-cell lymphomas. The aim of this randomized, multicenter, two-arm, open-label, phase III trial (NCT01482962) was to investigate the efficacy of alisertib monotherapy versus investigator’s choice treatment in R/R PTCL patients. The primary endpoints of this study were overall response rate (ORR), and progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included, overall survival (OS), safety, complete response (CR) rate, time-to-progression (TTP), time-to-partial response (TTR), and duration of response (DoR).
Study design & baseline characteristics
- N = 271 R/R PTCL patients after ≥ 1 prior system therapy, aged ≥ 18 were enrolled
- PTCL subtypes included:
- PTCL-not otherwise specified (NOS)
- Anaplastic large-cell lymphoma
- Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma
- Enteropathy associated T-cell lymphoma
- Hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma
- Subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma
- Transformed mycosis fungoides
- Extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma nasal type
- Patients were stratified according to:
- Extranodal disease
- International Prognostic Index (IPI) score:
- low/intermediate versus intermediate/high
- Region:
- North America and European Union versus the rest of the world
- Patients were randomized in two arms:
- Alisertib (Arm A; n = 138): orally, 50 mg twice daily on Days 1−7 (21-day cycles)
- Investigator’s choice monotherapy (Arm B; n = 133), intravenously either of the following:
- Gemcitabine (n = 30): 1000 mg/m2 over 30 min, on Days 1, 8, and 15 (28-day cycles)
- Pralatrexate (n = 80): 30 mg/m2 over 3−5 min once weekly for six weeks (7-week cycles)
- These patients also received vitamin B12 (1 mg every 8−10 weeks) and oral folic acid (1.0−25 mg daily)
- Romidepsin (n = 23; USA only): 14 mg/m2 over 4 h on Days 1, 8, and 15 (28-day cycles)
- Alisertib dose reductions with minimum 10 mg decrements per cycle and a maximum of two dose reductions were allowed in case of toxicity
- Baseline characteristics were well-balanced between the arms
- Median number or prior lines: 2
- Data cut-off: 30 June 2015
Key findings
- In the alisertib arm:
- Median number of treatment cycles (range) = 4 (0−50) cycles
- Mean treatment duration (range) = 20.8 (1−148) weeks
- Mean relative dose intensity = 92.9%
- In the comparator arm:
- Median number of treatment cycles (range) = 2 (0−17) cycles
- Mean treatment duration (range) = 16.6 (1−115) weeks
- Mean relative dose intensity = 66.1%
- ORR:
- Alisertib: 33% (n = 34/102 patients)
- Comparator arm: 45% (n = 41/92 patients)
- Comparison: odds ratio = 0.60 (95% CI, 0.33−1.08)
- Gemcitabine: 35% (n = 8/23)
- Pralatrexate: 43% (n = 22/51)
- Romidepsin: 61% (n = 11/18)
- CR rate:
- Alisertib: 18%
- Comparator arm: 27%
- Although the number of patients in the alisertib and comparator arms were balanced across regions, there was a greater difference in ORR between treatment arms in North America (29% alisertib versus 59% comparator) than in other regions (Western Europe: 33% versus 36%; rest of world: 36% versus 41%, respectively)
- Progressive disease (PD) was the most common reason for a PFS event in both arms
- Median PFS:
- Alisertib: 115 days
- Comparators: 104 days
- Gemcitabine: 57 days
- Pralatrexate: 101 days
- Romidepsin: 242 days
- Comparison: HR = 0.87, (95% CI, 0.644−1.162)
- Median follow-up duration for OS:
- Alisertib: 519 days
- Comparators: 586 days
- Median OS:
- Alisertib: 415 days
- Comparators: 367 days
- Comparison: HR = 0.98, (95% CI, 0.707−1.369)
- Twelve-month survival:
- Alisertib: 53.7%
- Comparators: 51.5%
- Twenty-four-month survival:
- Alisertib: 35%
- Comparators: 35%
- Median DoR:
- Alisertib: 225 days
- Comparators: 172 days
- Gemcitabine: 134 days
- Pralatrexate: 162 days
- Romidepsin: 473 days
- Median TTR:
- Alisertib: 62 days
- Comparators: 64 days
- Gemcitabine: 90 days
- Pralatrexate: 67 days
- Romidepsin: 61 days
- Median TTP:
- Alisertib: 162 days
- Comparators: 116 days
- Comparison: HR = 0.95, (95% CI, 0.679−1.329)
- At 24 months, patients who had not experienced PD:
- Alisertib: 12.8%
- Comparators: 14.3%
- Median time to subsequent antineoplactic therapy:
- Alisertib: 336 days
- Comparators: 233 days
- Gemcitabine: 144 days
- Pralatrexate: 233 days
- Romidepsin: not estimable
- Comparison: HR = 0.98, (95% CI, 0.692−1.385)
Safety
- Most common any cause Grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs; alisertib versus comparators):
- Neutropenia: 43% versus 25%
- Thrombocytopenia: 29% versus 27%
- Anemia: 33% versus 11%
- Most common treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs; alisertib versus comparators):
- Neutropenia: 45% versus 30%
- Thrombocytopenia: 34% versus 38%
- Anemia: 43% versus 24%
- Diarrhea: 32% versus 19%
- Stomatitis: 31% versus 42%
- Serious AEs occurred in:
- Alisertib: 55%
- Comparators: 54%
- Overall, 26 study deaths occurred (alisertib, 11 [8%]; comparators, 15 [12%])
- Of these, n = 3 in the alisertib and n = 1 in the comparator arm were drug-related
Conclusions
- Alisertib did not lead to superior outcomes (PFS, ORR) versus comparator drugs (gemcitabine, pralatrexate or romidepsin) when administered to R/R PTCL patients